tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-915526970342955572.post5202805217540579995..comments2024-02-22T00:40:25.640-05:00Comments on Outdoors with Frischkorn: UPDATED includes Prosecutor's comments: Ohio made to rehire wildlife officer who admitted to hunting while on dutyJeffrey L. Frischkornhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16127663725006300815noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-915526970342955572.post-6781369139582601122014-03-18T07:06:27.128-04:002014-03-18T07:06:27.128-04:00Arbitrators are referees agreed upon by the union ...Arbitrators are referees agreed upon by the union AND the employer (hence the term collective bargaining).. The employer lost the case, get over it ODNR. My guess is it went down like this: The IG finally found a prosecutor willing to take iffy cases at best (Brown County Five fiasco). These two were on the heels of that. They probably did nothing different than the infamous Wildlife 18, writing straight 8's on their time sheets. ODNR found that at least 16 of these did nothing wrong. To find anything else would be admitting that things were totally out of control in the division. However, a year earlier when it was just two officers, it could be blown off as a couple of rogue employees. Now, a year later these two officers have seen how ODNR let 16 of their peers off scot-free for the same thing, they appealed and won. Remember, they pleaded No Contest as opposed to Guilty--meaning they did what the complaint alleged but there were mitigating circumstances--just like the Wildlife 18 alledged.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-915526970342955572.post-15620301056979627592014-03-17T09:15:29.427-04:002014-03-17T09:15:29.427-04:00Wow looks like the Collective Bargaining Unit allo...Wow looks like the Collective Bargaining Unit allows corrupt activities to go on in the Division of Wildlife.......shameful. No wonder they feel they don't have to live by the same rules as the rest of us.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com