Wednesday, November 28, 2018

Poor weather for Ohio's on-going gun deer season blamed for drag on to-date kill

An on-going poor weather-induced firearms deer-hunting season has thus far become a sea anchor on Ohio’s to-date white-tail kill.

As of the weekly reporting period ending November 27th, 97,939 deer have recorded as being taken. That is a 9,174 animal drop from the comparable November 28th, 2017 to-date deer kill of 107,113 animals.

Not expected to help matters much is the fact that for the remainder of this week’s seven-day firearms deer-hunting season lies ahead a forecast of continued poor weather. Everything from high winds to more snow to freezing rain – and coupled with rising temperatures - could conspire to keep the gun harvest below its 2017 total of 72,814 animals. (In 2016 that figure was 66,758 deer, by the way).

However, a possible bright note does exist. Clint McCoy – the Ohio Division of Wildlife’s lead deer management biologist – says that if the gun season’s deer kill does lag but the weather for up-coming two-day “bonus” gun season December 16th and 17th makes a turn for the better, than “we could see a quick recovery in the harvest.”

As it now stands, of Ohio’s 88 counties, only six have to-date increases when compared to their respective and comparable 2017 to-date numbers. These counties (with their 2017 to-date numbers in parentheses) are: Clark – 462 (413); Greene – 477 (443); Medina – 1,131 (1,099); Montgomery – 454 (441); Portage – 1,442 (1,324); and Van Wert – 280 (268).

Among those counties seeing their respective 2018 to-date totals trail their respective 2017 numbers (with the latter in parentheses) are: Adams – 1,732 (1,989); Ashtabula – 2,729 (3,032); Brown – 1,290 (1,443); Fulton – 404 (456); Geauga – 1,052 (1,103); Guernsey – 2,346 (2,682); Hamilton – 984 (1,091); Hocking – 1,596 (1,891); Holmes – 2,316 (2,525); Jefferson – 951 (957); Knox – 2,436 (2,735); Lake – 480 (554); Licking – 2,626 (2,897); Lucas – 442 (466); Muskingum – 2,622 (3,081); Seneca – 974 (1,046); Trumbull – 2,088 (3,144); Tuscarawas – 2,853 (3,144); and Washington – 1,665 (1,842).

To-date in 2017, Ohio had four counties with at last three thousand deer as being reported killed each: Ashtabula – 3,032; Coshocton – 3,9023; Muskingum – 3,081; and Tuscarawas – 3,144. This year that number is only one, Coshocton County with 3,581.

Interestingly perhaps and in spite of the general downturn in the number of deer being taken thus far, the 2017 to-date roster featured 19 counties with fewer the five hundred animals each. This year that to-date figure stands at only 20 counties.

- Jeffrey L. Frischkorn
JFrischk@Ameritech.net

Tuesday, November 27, 2018

Poor Ohio gun deer opener contrasted against average fall turkey season kills

While it was just an average year for Ohio’s fall wild turkey hunters it was anything but for the opening day of the state’s seven-day firearms deer-hunting season.

The tally for the start of Ohio’s gun deer-hunting season, Monday, November 26th, was striking in its huge – 39 percent – drop from its 2017 counterpart. On Monday, hunters killed 13,614 deer compared to the 22,366 animals shot during the 2017 gun deer season opener.

Not a single one of Ohio’s 88 counties recorded an opening day this year when stacked up against its 2017 counterpart. Some counties experienced drops in excess of 40 percent or more. And just one county – Lucas – saw an identical kill.

Clearly poor weather statewide caused grief for hunters who were forced to deal with rain, high winds, sleet, snow and everything else bad that Mother Nature could toss at them. The result was easily the slowest gun deer season opener since at least 2014.

The opening day deer kill numbers for the past five years were: 2014 (17,512); 2015 (22,256); 2016 (18,776); 2017 -(22,336); and 2018 (13,614).

Although there are several factors that influence deer harvest, Monday’s weather undoubtedly impacted the number of deer that were killed,” said Wildlife Division spokesman John Windau.

It is important to remember, though, that there is plenty of season left which will provide opportunities for hunters to take deer.”

Yet a fall in numbers was not in the cards for Ohio’s 11,000-plus fall wild turkey hunters. Hunters killed 1,117 wild turkeys, which is up slightly from the 1,053 birds taken during the 2017 season but markedly lower than the 2016 banner season when 2,168 birds were shot.

This year, the fall wild turkey hunting season was open in 70 counties from Oct. 13-Nov. 25, an increase of three counties and which yielded. This year, three counties were open during the fall turkey season for the first time and which combined yielded 22 of the statewide 1,117 bird total. 

Thirty-two of the 70 counties saw increases when compared to their respective 2017 numbers, five counties saw identical numbers, three counties were new, and the remaining counties experienced declines.

Also, the total fall turkey-hunting season kill for 2013 through 2017 was: 2013 (1,037); 2014 (1,239); 2015 (1,537); 2016 (2,168); and 2017 (1,060). By comparison, the spring 2018 turkey hunting season saw a total kill of 22,571 bearded birds only.

I haven’t had the opportunity to look closely at the county-by-county harvest numbers to see if there were any regional changes but this year’s overall harvest is pretty consistent with what has been seen in recent years,” said Mark Wiley, the Ohio Division of Wildlife’s turkey management biologist.”


Here are the county-by-county 2018 opening day deer kill numbers (with their respective 2017 figures in parentheses): Adams: 187 (354); Allen: 45 (93); Ashland: 277 (432); Ashtabula: 488 (821); Athens: 281 (478); Auglaize: 60 (94); Belmont: 215 (362); Brown: 153 (292); Butler: 26 (85); Carroll: 339 (575); Champaign: 64 (121); Clark: 38 (56); Clermont: 63 (179); Clinton: 43 (84); Columbiana: 269 (453); Coshocton: 587 (924); Crawford: 112 (177); Cuyahoga: 11 (15); Darke: 50 (90); Defiance: 145 (252); Delaware: 72 (135); Erie: 41 (69); Fairfield: 126 (213); Fayette: 13 (32); Franklin: 29 (45); Fulton: 77 (101); Gallia: 237 (396); Geauga: 113 (146); Greene: 34 (48); Guernsey: 402 (657); Hamilton: 20 (34); Hancock: 79 (133); Hardin: 91 (139); Harrison: 285 (497); Henry: 59 (112); Highland: 183 (315); Hocking: 249 (426); Holmes: 386 (648); Huron: 204 (370); Jackson: 241 (358); Jefferson: 152 (244); Knox: 424 (705); Lake: 35 (54); Lawrence: 152 (262); Licking: 395 (577); Logan: 137 (219); Lorain: 130 (200); Lucas: 24 (24); Madison: 22 (40); Mahoning: 144 (209); Marion: 86 (122); Medina: 109 (153); Meigs: 229 (414); Mercer: 55 (86); Miami: 35 (72); Monroe: 220 (406); Montgomery: 19 (35); Morgan: 274 (434); Morrow: 120 (228); Muskingum: 489 (780); Noble: 283 (445); Ottawa: 15 (39); Paulding: 87 (129); Perry: 243 (359); Pickaway: 51 (96); Pike: 122 (199); Portage: 104 (142); Preble: 41 (74); Putnam: 59 (94); Richland: 261 (411); Ross: 186 (307); Sandusky: 48 (68); Scioto: 126 (206); Seneca: 141 (244); Shelby: 65 (119); Stark: 184 (248); Summit: 23 (29); Trumbull: 283 (487); Tuscarawas: 511 (768); Union: 56 (103); Van Wert: 43 (50); Vinton: 168 (322); Warren: 38 (62); Washington: 320 (476); Wayne: 184 (265); Williams: 150 (251); Wood: 43 (74); Wyandot: 134 (224).
Total: 13,614 (22,366).

Here are the county-by-county fall turkey harvest totals (with their respective 2017 figures in parentheses. An * designates a county that was open during the 2018 season, but was not open during the 2017 season): Adams: 11 (20); Allen : 8 (4); Ashland: 14 (15); Ashtabula: 39 (46); Athens: 20 (15); Belmont: 29 (23); Brown: 10 (9); Butler: 7 (6); Carroll: 20 (19); Champaign: 2 (3); Clermont: 13 (15); Columbiana: 16 (22); Coshocton: 52 (54); Crawford: 1 (3); Cuyahoga: 6 (2); Defiance: 14 (9); Delaware: 9 (11); Erie*: 6 (0); Fairfield: 12 (6); Fulton: 10 (6); Gallia: 32 (31); Geauga: 34 (16); Guernsey: 41 (31); Hamilton: 11 (11); Hancock*: 4 (0); Hardin: 2 (3); Harrison: 35 (28); Henry: 3 (3); Highland: 25 (25); Hocking: 20 (8); Holmes: 32 (26); Huron: 12 (5); Jackson: 21 (18); Jefferson: 8 (19); Knox: 18 (17); Lake: 9 (9); Lawrence: 19 (12); Licking: 25 (30); Logan: 10 (4); Lorain: 5 (16); Lucas*: 12 (0); Mahoning: 11 (11); Medina: 13 (17); Meigs: 19 (20); Monroe: 28 (22); Morgan: 28 (12); Morrow: 6 (19); Muskingum: 25 (20); Noble: 30 (19); Paulding: 2 (8); Perry: 17 (19); Pike: 18 (12); Portage: 18 (15); Preble: 9 (10); Putnam: 5 (8); Richland: 19 (28); Ross: 17 (13); Scioto: 25 (7); Seneca: 2 (9); Stark: 14 (25); Summit: 9 (13); Trumbull: 21 (28); Tuscarawas: 40 (25); Vinton: 11 (18); Warren: 4 (6); Washington: 19 (18); Wayne: 9 (8); Williams: 13 (25); Wyandot: 4 (5); Total: 1,117 (1,053).

- Jeffrey L. Frischkorn
JFrischk@Ameritech.net

Wednesday, November 21, 2018

Ohio's exceptional youth-only deer gun season adds to to-date totals

What a difference one year - and nicer, more hunting-conducive weather - can do to an overall firearms deer-season kill.

That detail includes Ohio’s recently held two-day youth-only firearms deer-hunting season. Whereas the 2017 youth gun season hunt was plagued by miserable weather, at least one day this year and for nearly the entire state saw much better hunting conditions.

All of which led to a boast in the two-day youth-only season kill from 4,958 animals in 2017 to 6,563 animals this year, the season having been held November 17th and 18th.

And the large volley fired by the youths contributed to a jump in the weekly to-date overall deer kill as well. In fact, only an election in Florida would see such a tightening of numbers; the overall to-date 2017 and 2018 deer kill statistics being that close.

Returning to the just-concluded youth-only firearms deer-hunting season, the 6,563 deer killed was the largest such number since the 2015 youth-only season hunt when 7,223 animals were taken by youngsters.

Going back to 2014, the youth-only deer kill numbers were 6,453; the 2015 figure again was 7,223; the 2016 number was 5,930; and the 2017 figure again was 4,958.

As for the county-by-county take during the 2018 youth-only season, we see that of Ohio’s 88 counties, 12 saw declines and three counties posted identical 2017 and 2018 youth-only season deer kills. The remaining 73 counties posted gains in 2018 over their 2017 youth-only gun season totals.

Of all the deer seasons we have, the youth hunt is the most impacted by the weather. If it’s bad than the kids don’t go and the adults don’t take them,” said Clint McCoy, the Ohio Division of Wildlife’s lead deer management biologist.

McCoy did say that because the youth-only firearms hunt went so well that the numbers contributed to the uptick in the current weekly to-date deer kill figures.

However, those looking forward to the general firearms deer-hunting season need not worry that the youths shot off all of the state’s bucks and does.

Spread out over the entire state, the youth hunt harvest really does not impact the general firearms deer season harvest results,” McCoy said.

That youth-only harvest results will stand on the shoulders of the to-date deer kill totals on the eve of Ohio’s general firearms season. And right now the overall to-date 2018 kill is mirroring the comparable 2017 to date figure.

So far and as of the November 20th 2018 weekly reporting period, 67,881 deer have been killed. For the comparable November 21st 2017 weekly reporting period that number was 67,291 animals, or only a 590 animal difference.

Between the November 13th, 2018 and the November 20th, 2018 reporting periods, Ohio’s deer hunters shot 13,573 animals, including those deer taken during the two-day/youth-only firearms season.

Now that we are in the all-implements phases of Ohio’s deer hunting seasons the numbers are combined as to what hunters are using to take their animals.

In looking at the statistics, of Ohio’s 88 counties, 49 of them posted gains when compared to their respective 2017 to-date numbers while three counties had identical figures. The remaining 36 counties posted declines.

Among those counties seeing increases (with their respective and comparable 2017 numbers in parentheses) were: Brown – 904 (899); Fairfield – 728 (696); Gallia – 854 (756); Hardin – 421 (393); Holmes – 1,635 (1,576); Jefferson – 602 (560); Knox – 1,673 (1,590); Medina – 877 (810); Mercer – 299 (257); Noble – 1,001 (958); Portage – 1,091 (920); Stark – 1,193 (1,137); Trumbull – 1,515 (1,470); and Wyandot – 502 (460).

Among those counties seeing decreases (with their respective and comparable 2017 numbers in parentheses) were: Adams – 1,289 (1,344); Ashtabula – 1,739 (1,769); Columbiana – 981 (1,013); Geauga – 759 (788); Guernsey – 1,454 (1,533); Harrison – 1,123 (1,165); Hocking – 1,041 (1,097); Lake – 398 (452); Licking – 1,890 (1,948); Marion – 272 (273); Muskingum – 1,641 (1,713); Tuscarawas – 1,867 (1,882); and Vinton – 936 (939).

The three counties with identical 2017 and 2018 to-date deer kill numbers were Allen – 406; Crawford 378; and Jackson – 1,098.

To date, 24 of Ohio’s 88 counties have reported deer kills of one-thousand animals or more each. The comparable 2017 figure was 23 counties.

The county-by-county results for the two-day youth-only firearms deer-hunting season are:

Adams: 145 (106); Allen: 35 (21); Ashland: 133 (72); Ashtabula: 155 (115); Athens: 132 (97); Auglaize: 38 (20); Belmont: 135 (143); Brown: 84 (60); Butler: 36 (21); Carroll: 111 (135); Champaign: 53 (24); Clark: 26 (14); Clermont: 67 (33); Clinton: 39 (25); Columbiana: 84 (93); Coshocton: 287 (225); Crawford: 37 (37); Cuyahoga: 1 (0); Darke: 27 (24); Defiance: 67 (46); Delaware: 31 (17); Erie: 83 (71); Fairfield: 62 (60); Fayette: 14 (9); Franklin: 11 (11); Fulton: 18 (19); Gallia: 126 (76); Geauga: 42 (30); Greene: 29 (13); Guernsey: 154 (155); Hamilton: 12 (10); Hancock: 35 (34); Hardin: 42 (28); Harrison: 116 (119); Henry: 19 (22); Highland: 94 (97); Hocking: 84 (77); Holmes: 235 (125); Huron: 96 (59); Jackson: 117 (88); Jefferson: 82 (63); Knox: 185 (124); Lake: 12 (7); Lawrence: 78 (57); Licking: 145 (130); Logan: 90 (48); Lorain: 58 (39); Lucas: 10 (7); Madison: 28 (17); Mahoning: 56 (35); Marion: 22 (24); Medina: 43 (28); Meigs: 138 (104); Mercer: 22 (16); Miami: 32 (16); Monroe: 98 (84); Montgomery: 13 (5); Morgan: 144 (82); Morrow: 54 (32); Muskingum: 170 (164); Noble: 118 (75); Ottawa: 19 (19); Paulding: 42 (33); Perry: 85 (89); Pickaway: 28 (30); Pike: 91 (59); Portage: 29 (20); Preble: 47 (29); Putnam: 42 (27); Richland: 112 (71); Ross: 136 (138); Sandusky: 29 (9); Scioto: 98 (70); Seneca: 83 (68); Shelby: 45 (29); Stark: 79 (56); Summit: 14 (6); Trumbull: 96 (49); Tuscarawas: 223 (186); Union: 37 (26); Van Wert: 38 (14); Vinton: 92 (67); Warren: 34 (18); Washington: 117 (101); Wayne: 77 (54); Williams: 43 (26); Wood: 34 (25); Wyandot: 83 (51).
Total: 6,563 (4,958).

- Jeffrey L. Frischkorn
JFrischk@Ameritech.net

Tuesday, November 20, 2018

Burrr! Likely coldest-ever November 22nd Thanksgiving Day for Cleveland

With Thanksgiving Day a little more than 24 hours away, Northeast Ohioans looking to celebrate may have to do so cold turkey.

The forecast for the day is a wishbone-chilly 28 degrees for a high with Wednesday night’s projected low at a feather-ruffling 20 degrees. By all accounts it is expected to be one of the coldest Thanksgiving Days on record, and the coldest by far for a Thanksgiving Day falling on a November 22nd.

If that be the case, let’s look at that record as compiled by the National Weather Service. Of course, honoring Thanksgiving Day is something similar to hitting a moving target: the event is not celebrated on the same date the way New Years, July 4th or Christmas are commemorated.

Thanksgiving is locked in the last Thursday in November. Thus, the earliest Thanksgiving can be anchored is November 20th and the latest is November 30th. That is a huge date swing at a time of year when both temperature and participation are meteorically highly variable.

In looking back through the Weather Service’s record books we see that since 1887, Thanksgiving Day has fallen on November 22nd a total of 11 times, the last one occurring in 2013. On those 11 instances the coldest was in 1956 with a low temperature of 17 degrees and a high of 31 degrees.

So if the high does climb only to the projected 28 degree it will become the coldest November 22nd Thanksgiving Day on record.

For November 22nd, the normal (average) high is 48 degrees while the normal (average) low for the date is 35 degrees. The date’s record high was the 73 degrees checked off in 1934 with the date’s record low being the zero degrees, marked in 1880. (Yes, there is a difference between record highs-lows and statistics compiled for holidays).

Oh, the warmest Thanksgiving for the November 22nd date was the 61 degrees which was recorded in 2012.

We also see that of the 11 November 22nd Thanksgiving Days currently on the books, snow has fallen only twice though precipitation has arrived in one form or other six times.

Just for more Thanksgiving Day weather trivia, the warmest ever for the holiday was 70 degrees, which was recorded November 26th, 1896. The coldest ever Thanksgiving Day was 7 degrees, which happened November 27th 1930.

Also, the snowiest-ever Thanksgiving as recorded for Cleveland was the 0.9 inches that fell November 27th, 2014.

Since 1887, precipitation in one form or another has fallen 81 times on Thanksgiving Day, or 62 percent of the time.


- Jeffrey L. Frischkorn
JFrischk@Ameritech.net

Saturday, November 17, 2018

A Thanksgiving story to relish; everything you wanted to know about the cran(e)berry

With the Thanksgiving Day celebration knocking on the door, here’s an opportunity to look at a couple of the iconic food stuffs many of us will be – well, stuffing ourselves with a few more days.

Each is wildlife related. And I’ll toss in a third one for free that’s not entirely wildlife related, but it works for me.

The first installment is the cranberry; the basis for that tart, red-colored blob that many people pop out of a can without paying much heed. Actually, that jellied mash of cranberry sauce – or the burgundy-colored cranberry juice some people will drink on Thanksgiving Day – are a highly processed fruit that hearkens back to Native American culture.

And though some people may assume that cranberry plants live in shallow water impoundments that is not true. They grow in natural and man-made bogs; acidic environments which are seasonally flooded to about thigh deep. A mechanical harvester than cultivates the flooded plants (an evergreen dwarf shrub, to be exact, but I digress), scooping out the berries - which rise to the surface, owing to the fact that each berry has a “bubble” of air that causes it to float. The berries are then raked to an awaiting drain where they are eventually washed and processed.

About 95 percent of all cranberries are harvested this way. The remaining five percent are picked dry; these are the special berries that you see being sold whole in stores and are used in baking and personalized cooking. In the case of my wife, Bev, that is how she makes a delightfully tart-sweet cranberry-orange relish for Thanksgiving.

Oh, the wildlife part. The name, “cranberry” is a shortened version of the German “kraanberre.” If you detect the word association “craneberry,” you are spot on. Up until fairly recently craneberry was what some people called them, in fact.

There are two possibilities for this naming, too. The first is pretty pedestrian in a science sort of way. The plant’s flower, neck, stem, calyx, and petals are said to resemble the curved neck, the head and the bill of a crane. Boring, perhaps, but somewhat scientifically logical in assigning a name.

I like the other, lesser well known, possible christening. It appears that when the Pilgrims began settling in Massachusetts they observed cranes – no doubt, sandhill cranes – feasting in craneberry bogs. These people thought the birds were eating the fruit, which the cranes were not. Or at least not to a large extent. Cranes eat insects, snails, amphibians and such high-fat/high-protein food stuffs as much as they do waste grain and craneberries. Even more so.

Which is why you often view cranes feasting throughout plowed fields; something you can see each spring along the Platt River in Nebraska where cranes gather by the tens of thousands to pick their the earth to pluck whatever bugs with help replenish their fat reserves to help get them to the breeding grounds in Arctic. To see and hear thousands upon thousands of cranes lifting off from the shallow-water Platt River to feed in fields is a life-memorable experience.

The same is increasingly being observed here in Ohio as the sandhill crane species is making a remarkable, on-its-own, recovery in the state.

And though Ohio does have some craneberry bogs – notably the 12-acre Cranberry Bog State Nature Preserve at Buckeye Lake in Licking County – there are no commercial operations in the state. It is known, however, that Native Americans living around that region did way back when harvest the berries.

There you have it. Maybe more than you really ever wanted to know about cranberries. Or craneberries, if you want to start an interesting conversation at your family’s Thanksgiving Day dinner table.

Next up: The turkey – a Western Hemisphere native with a Middle East moniker...



With the Thanksgiving Day celebration knocking on the door, here’s an opportunity to look at a couple of the iconic food stuffs many of us will be – well, stuffing ourselves with a few more days.

Each is wildlife related. And I’ll toss in a third one for free that’s not entirely wildlife related, but it works for me.

The first installment is the cranberry; the basis for that tart, red-colored blob that many people pop out of a can without paying much heed. Actually, that jellied mash of cranberry sauce – or the burgundy-colored cranberry juice some people will drink on Thanksgiving Day – are a highly processed fruit that hearkens back to Native American culture.

And though some people may assume that cranberry plants live in shallow water impoundments that is not true. They grow in natural and man-made bogs; acidic environments which are seasonally flooded to about thigh deep. A mechanical harvester than cultivates the flooded plants (an evergreen dwarf shrub, to be exact, but I disgress), scooping out the berries - which rise to the surface, owing to the fact that each berry has a “bubble” of air that causes it to float. The berries are then raked to an awaiting drain where they are eventually washed and processed.

About 95 percent of all cranberries are harvested this way. The remaining five percent are picked dry; these are the special berries that you see being sold whole in stores and are used in baking and personalized cooking. In the case of my wife, Bev, that is how she makes a delightfully tart-sweet cranberry-orange relish for Thanskgiving.

Oh, the wildlife part. The name, “cranberry” is a shortened version of the German “kraanberre.” If you detect the word association “craneberry,” you are spot on. Up until fairly recently craneberry was what some people called them, in fact.

There are two possibilities for this naming, too. The first is pretty pedestrian in a science sort of way. The plant’s flower, neck, stem, calyx, and petals are said to resemble the curved neck, the head and the bill of a crane. Boring, perhaps, but somewhat scientifically logical in assigning a name.

I like the other, lesser well known, possible christening. It appears that when the Pilgrims began settling in Massachusetts they observed cranes – no doubt, sandhill cranes – feasting in craneberry bogs. These people thought the birds were eating the fruit, which the cranes were not. Or at least not to a large extent. Cranes eat insects, snails, amphibians and such high-fat/high-protein food stuffs as much as they do waste grain and craneberries. Even more so.

Which is why you often view cranes feasting throughout plowed fields; something you can see each spring along the Platt River in Nebraska where cranes gather by the tens of thousands to pick their the earth to pluck whatever bugs with help replenish their fat reserves to help get them to the breeding grounds in Arctic. To see and hear thousands upon thousands of cranes lifting off from the shallow-water Platt River to feed in fields is a life-memorable experience.

The same is increasingly being observed here in Ohio as the sandhill crane species is making a remarkable, on-its-own, recovery in the state.

And though Ohio does have some craneberry bogs – notably the 12-acre Cranberry Bog State Nature Preserve at Buckeye Lake in Licking County – there are no commercial operations in the state. It is known, however, that Native Americans living around that region did way back when harvest the berries.

There you have it. Maybe more than you really ever wanted to know about cranberries. Or craneberries, if you want to start an interesting conversation at your family’s Thanksgiving Day dinner table.

Next up: The turkey – a Western Hemisphere native with a Middle East moniker...


- Jeffrey L. Frischkorn
JFrischk@Ameritech.net

Wednesday, November 14, 2018

Latest Ohio weekly to-date deer kill numbers slip when compared to 2017

Depending upon where one lives in Ohio, either the rut is still in full swing or the bucks’ testosterone levels have begun to ebb.

And many of the state’s deer hunters are taking advantage of the annual mating ritual, with a to-date kill of 54,308 animals and based upon the end of the Ohio Division of Wildlife’s weekly reporting period through November 13th, 2018.

That 54,308 figure is, however, 2,367 fewer animals than the 56,675 deer reported taken during the comparable to-date November 14th, 2017 reporting period.

Still the 54,308 number represents an increased kill of 15,982 deer taken during the previous week. Or put another way, the 15,982 figure does represent a small shrinkage from the weekly reported deer kill between the October 30th, 2018 and November 6th, 2018 accounting.

Obviously, there are many ways to look at the weekly deer kill numbers.

Take, for instance, only 21 of Ohio’s 88 counties reported increases in the number of deer taken to-date as of November 13th, 2018 when compared to their comparable November 14th, 2017 numbers. Last week, increases were noted in 48 of Ohio’s 88 counties. And for the first time this year, Coshocton County saw a decline in its comparable 2017 and 2018 respective to-date numbers.

Only one county – Preble – saw an identical to-date 2017 and 2018 number (349 animals). The rest of the state’s counties saw respective declines.

Among the year-to-year comparison declines (with their respective to-date 2017 numbers in parentheses – and take note of some of the steep fall-offs) were: Adams – 991 (1,118); Ashtabula – 1,425 (1,546); Brown – 719 (745); Coshocton – 1,981 (2,016); Geauga – 634 (702); Guernsey – 1,161 (1,229); Hamilton – 746 (849); Hocking – 857 (935); Holmes – 1,259 (1,352); Lake – 338 (406); Lorain – 730 (822); Lucas – 321 (355); Muskingum – 1,284 (1,395); Shelby – 286 (328); Trumbull – 1,300 (1,335); Tuscarawas – 1,467 (1,545); and Vinton – 747 (797).

And among the gainers (with their respective to-date 2017 numbers in parentheses) were: Auglaize – 289 (282); Gallia – 634 (600); Hardin – 346 (343); Jefferson – 454 (444); Media – 746 (707); Ottawa – 165 (162); Portage – 968 (825); Stark – 995 (987); and Wayne 709 (701).

Also, to-date as of the November 13th 2018 reporting period, there are 10 counties with kills exceeding one thousand animals each. As for the November 14th, 2017 reporting period, there were 12 such counties, including one county – Coshocton - with more than two thousand animals reported as being taken.

- Jeffrey L. Frischkorn
JFrischk@Ameritech.net

Thursday, November 8, 2018

Ohio's weekly deer kill stats may be hinting at urban white-tail herd declines

Today marked the 18th archery hunt of the season, totaling 48 hours, without so much as seeing an animal.

Note, not passing on a deer nor failing to have one come within crossbow range. Nope, those figures are without so much as catching a glimpse of a departing flagged tail.

The hunts are divided between three Lake County sites, each of which in years past provided antlered and antlerless deer. One of the sites is located on a friend’s property in a village that allows controlled archery deer hunting via a community-issued permit. Another is sequestered on a private arboretum that requires both its and a city’s permission. The last one is “free range,” located in a township without the legally binding demands of antler point restrictions or a doe-first policy as is the case with the other two spots.

However, I have taken note that over the past few years the numbers of deer I’ve seen - and consequently recorded in a journal - has dropped. Which is a good thing if you are the director of an arboretum or else a village or city police chief who has to send a squad car out when a Buick and a buck meet on a darkened highway.

For a deer hunter? Not so much. Which got me to thinking about the weekly deer kill updates I assemble utilizing data compiled by the Ohio Division of Wildlife and made available each Wednesday.

I’ve have taken note of my home county and a number of others that seem to be struggling in reaching the same deer kill levels they did at the same point in time one year ago. So dug a little deeper into the raw statistics.

Mind you, this is not a scientific report nor an in-depth research paper. Still, the information is cool in a “huh” sort of way. If nothing else it might provide fodder for discussion around the deer camp dinner table.

What I did was take Ohio’s four largest cities, their respective core county and all of the counties adjacent to them. Then I compared these urban/suburban/bedroom units’ respective to-date deer kills with their comparable 2017 to-date numbers.

The idea being to mull over whether more generous deer bag limits, increased allowance by communities to permit controlled archery deer hunting – along with the assumption that deer hunters are sticking closer to home – may finally be having an impact on deer herd size in Ohio’s urban/suburban/bedroom counties.

The cities are Cleveland, Columbus, Cincinnati, and Toledo. Here is what I saw for each cell, using the current November 6th, 2108 to-date figures with their comparable November 7th, 2017 to-date figures.

Cleveland: The core is Cuyahoga County – 381 (417); Lorain County – 548 (582); Media County – 571 (515); Geauga County – 451 (506); Summit County – 491 (517); and Lake County – 252 (300). (I tossed out Portage County since the only the corners of Cuyahoga and Portage meet.) Consequently, five of the six counties have thus experienced to-date deer kill declines.

Columbus: The core is Franklin County – 214 (238); Fairfield County – 390 (349); Licking County – 1,082 (1,101); Madison County – 120 (110); Pickaway County – 133 (130); Delaware County – 417 (419); and Union County – 249 (249, identical). Consequently, three of these seven counties have thus far seen declines and one has seen identical to-date numbers.

Cincinnati - The core is Hamilton County – 565 (634); Butler County – 357 (410); Warren County – 309 (313); and Clermont County – 614 (634). Thus, all four counties have seen to-date deer kill declines.

Toledo – The core is Lucas County – 235 (278); Fulton County – 156 (166); Ottawa County – 125 (118); and Wood County – 237 (216). (I pitched Henry County for the same reason I did for the Cuyahoga-Portage reason.) Here, two of the four counties have seen to-date declines and two have seen to-date increasees.

It would be easy to dismiss such an examination since some individual county comparisons show minuscule differences. After all, there’s not much variance in Pickaway County’s two numbers nor those of Ottawa County.

Ah, here’s the “but,” though. Of Ohio’s 88 counties, 37 of of them have to-date deer kill declines when stacked up against their respective and comparable 2017 numbers. And 14 of those 37 counties are clustered around just these four major cities; four in the Cincinnati and five in the Cleveland areas alone.

Perhaps even more importantly I’ve watched a trend whereby these named counties are generally tracking in the decline column throughout the to-date 2018-2019 weekly deer kill tallies.

As for my own Lake County? Well, I’ve taken interest in noting the current to-date deer kill is about 18 percent less than its comparable 2017 numbers. Also, if my recollection is worth anything, it has continued to fall the past few years.

If nothing else, spending time with the numbers have helped given me a great excuse as to why I am not seeing many deer.

- Jeffrey L. Frischkorn
JFrischk@Ameritech.net

Wednesday, November 7, 2018

Ohio's deer hunters now taking huge advantage of species' annual autumn rut

In the see-saw swing between Ohio deer hunter success and white-tails giving the slip, the state’s sportsmen came out ahead in the latest weekly deer kill report when stacked up against the same data-collecting period in 2017.

Based upon figures available via the Ohio Division of Wildlife, as of November 6th, 2018 Ohio’s deer hunters had killed 38,326 animals. Among them were 17,683 antlered deer.

For the comparable period ending November 7th, 2017, Ohio’s deer hunters had shot 37,861 animals, of which 17,354 were antlered deer.

Also in further mining the data, between the October 30t, 2018 and the November 6th, 2018 reporting periods, Ohio hunters had killed an additional 11,621 animals – or about 30 percent of the 2018 to-date total. This almost certainly indicates the vulnerability of deer during the rut.

And of Ohio’s 88 counties, 48 saw increases in their respective to-date deer kills when the November 6th, 2018 and November 7th, 2017 reporting periods are examined side by side. Three counties saw identical reporting period kills while the remaining counties experienced declines.

That 48 figure likewise is a huge jump from the October 30th, 2018 reporting period where just 26 counties had seen increases from the respective October 31st, 2017 deer kill numbers.

Among the beneficiaries of increases in their respective November 6th, 2018 kills when laid side-by-side with their comparable November 7th, 2017 kills (with their corresponding November 7th, 2017 numbers in parentheses) were: Carroll – 614 (560); Coshocton – 1,431 (1,305); Gallia – 422 (350); Jackson – 600 (549); Knox – 953 (894); Media – 571 (515); Meigs – 534 (462); Mercer – 176 (154); Muskingum – 891 (859); Portage – 705 (589); Scioto – 409 (377); Seneca – 417 (367); Stark – 727 (698); and Wayne – 533 (485).

Among the counties with decreases in their November 6th, 2018 kills when compared to their respective November 7th, 2017 kills (with their corresponding November 7th, 2017 numbers in parentheses) were: Adams 651 (676); Ashtabula – 1,059 (1,171); Butler – 357 (410); Erie – 233 (255); Fayette – 56 (68); Geauga – 451 (506); Holmes – 940 (972); Lake – 252 (300); Lucas – 235 (278); Morrow – 330 (358); Richland – 733 (788); Summit – 491 (517); Trumbull – 1,022 (1,040); and Williams – 362 (382).

The three counties posting identical numbers were: Guernsey – 766; Montgomery – 224; and Union – 249.

- Jeffrey L. Frishkorn
JFrischk@Ameritech.net