Monday, June 16, 2014

Close to shore is close to Lake Erie angler's heart



The rocks are real and the paper is no longer being used, what with GPS now being electronic and all.

As for the scissors, well, those are those new-fangled titanium floating needle-nose pliers with the razor-sharp blades that sear their way through the toughest braided fishing line.

All were used – still used, in fact – whenever Paul Liikala of Cuyahoga Falls decides to take his “Miss Yellow” for an outing on Lake Erie.

Lately his and her joint trips on the big lake have not involved an all-day adventure, either. That’s true even though Paul is on the other side of Medicare eligibility while Miss Yellow is doing a good job of hiding he age.

At 14 feet with an engine of only 15 horsepower, Miss Yellow is hardly suitable for high-speed runs to Lake Erie’s fabled walleye-fishing ground hanging close to the International Line.

No matter, for near shore duty has long proven a staple in Liikala’s repertoire of how to catch fish in places scorned or passed up by other anglers.

The is the daily home waters to walleye, yellow perch, smallmouth bass and even those fishes shunned by anglers who also believe one needs a big boat, a massive array of line-counting reels and matching fishing poles along with good credit at the local marina fuel dock.

Then again, Liikala has enjoyed fishing the lake’s littoral zone from the closing days of the blue pike era in the early 1950s clear through the hey-day of the walleye and now into the better mixed bag footing.

He learned much of it from his late father, Archie, who fished the lake’s near-shore waters off North Perry Village, east to the Lake County-Ashtabula County line and west to the mouth of the Grand River.

Like father, like son, as neither man ever complained about catching “only” a partial legal daily limit of walleye. For them, fishing was – IS for Paul – more about the job of figuring out the fish than it is about reeling in a legal limit horde for the freezer.

“It’s something of a lost art,” Liikaka said as we plied the near-shore waters somewhere to the east of the Grand River.

Exactly where is a secret known to Liikala (and me). Thing is, this near-shore zone and its bountiful supply of rock piles is hardly virgin fishing water. Just largely forgotten and by-passed, says Liikala.

“Anymore,” also said Liikala as he prepared his four rigs for a few hours of slow trolling within easy sight of land, “I look for an opportunity to fish a ‘window’ on Lake Erie.”

That so-called window means that even before Liikala powers up Miss Yellow and stared at the screen of his Humminbird electronic GPS/fish finder he had explored the latest marine weather forecast. His desire is that a few hours of relatively tame winds would provide an equally agreeable few hours of angling.

Once Liikala has a general idea of a general place to start he begins to become more specific. That’s when he plumbs the depths of his massive Bass Pro Shops’ soft-sided tackle satchel, looking for just the right lure or lure combination.

For this particular fishing excursion Liikala attached his own home-made worm harnesses to a pair of a quartet of rigs. Each of them had line counter reels bound with super-braid lines and along with rods of unknown age, though Liikala is partial to pedigree, that being Berkley.

“Graphite rods are way too stiff for this kind of fishing, which is why I much prefer to use rods made from fiberglass,” Liikala said. “You really need to have that flex.”

The first of the two worm harnesses had pale pink plastic beads and brass-finished willow-leaf blades. When those worm harnesses failed to entice much in the way of fish Liikala looked at the small things.

Thus be believed he would find better success with worm harnesses that while still fitted with pale pink beads were best fitted with same-size willow-leaf blades that featured gold tinting.

Yep, small things do matter when fishing near-shore waters, Liikala believes.

“Subtlieties,” he said.

Yes, including employing a three-way rig that featured a worm-harness on top and a diving crankbait on the bottom leader. Where once just about every Lake Erie troller worth his Erie Dearie fished at least one three-way rig now practicallyno one does, excluding Liikala, of course.

To the other two poles and their appointments Liikala chose either a Storm Junior Thunderstik or else a Reef Runner. Their coloration leaned toward the garish; maybe a pink head with a purple body and chrome belly on one and a fire tiger pattern on another.

“We’ll be going through a lot of lures today,” Liikala said. “It’s the best way to find what the walleye and smallmouth want the most.”

At this point we cannot overlook another important element that Liikala swears by: Incorporating in-line plainer boards rather than burdening his Miss Yellow with some monstrosity of a mast pole and spider-webbed planer board lines.

“These Offshore in-line plainers do a lot better in rougher water where the lines are constantly being released from their clips,” Liikala said.

If memory serves correctly – and I believe it does – Liikala assigned the plainer lines/worm harnesses to the inside duty while the outside job was reserved for the plainer lines/crankbaits.

Most importantly of all in tackling in-shore trolling, Liikala believes, is the fish finder. This device is crucial for success and Liikala’s eyes seldom strayed from the electronic’s screen.

The reason being was that Liikala was hunting more for the region’s unseen rock piles; those humps of natural or man-made structures consisting of stones heaved one on top the other and fanning out to create a feel-good home for the fishes.

These rock piles, by the way, are common elements running from the mouth of the Grand River and east to off at least Madison Township and beyond to off the Geneva State Park harbor and marina.

Head west and an angler can find similar structure as far as the Chagrin River’s outlet with some decent bundles of heavy-duty rocks anchored off the Mentor Lagoons.

These packages of fish-attracting geology are secured as often as not in shallow water, the so-called littoral zone.

Paul hunts for these rock piles – which may be no larger than a coffee table or a living room at most – in water generally of 10 to 30 feet deep; seldom more and only occasionally, less.

“My dad would always fish this zone and seldom did it fail him,” Liikala said.

Nor did the rock piles Liikala homed in on both from experience and GPS/fish finder use decided to lay an egg.

Concentrating first on the 10 to 20 foot depth range and then extending it to the 20 to 30 foot depth range, we were able to secure in the cooler four delightfully plump walleye. The fish each measured between 22 and 24 inches, not super big but certainly supper-ready.

Again if memory serves two of the walleyes came on minnow-imitating crankbaits with the other two walleye succumbed to the worm harnesses.
  
“Last week when I was here with another friend we caught one walleye that was 30 inches,” Liikala said.

Along with the four walleye the rigs scored on one Fish Ohio-qualifying 13¼-inch yellow perch, a two-pound smallmouth bass, several over-size white perch and an equal number of respectable-size white bass. Oh, and a handful or two of freshwater drum up to 21 inches.

Okay, so maybe four walleye for four hours of fishing is not an impressive catch for the big-boat crowd.

Yet considering that we could watch a pair of immature eagles swoop and soar along the close-at-hand shoreline and view an osprey hunt the same, you didn’t see either Liikala let alone me complain any.

“More and more I truly enjoy this kind of fishing the most ,” Liikala said. “I bet we’ll only burn a couple gallons of gas, too.”

For once Liikala was incorrect. His Miss Yellow and her Evinrude outboard consumed a whole three gallons of gasoline.

Just remember that the next time you leave port and head out to 70 feet of water in a not-always dependable search for the elusive Lake Erie walleye.

- Jeffrey L. Frischkorn
JFrischk@Ameritech.net


Jeff is the retired News-Herald reporter who  covered the earth sciences, the area's three county park systems and the outdoors for the newspaper. During his 30 years with The News-Herald Jeff was the recipient of more than 100 state, regional and national journalism awards. He also is a columnist and features writer for the Ohio Outdoor News, which is published every other week and details the outdoors happenings in the state.



Friday, June 13, 2014

UPDATED 6/16 Mentor (Ohio) Police seek to swap out Kimber .45 ACP handguns for 9mm Glocks




In an effort to upgrade its arsenal of duty-carry firearms, the Mentor (Ohio) Police Department is looking to replace its inventory of American-made Kimber semi-automatic handguns with Austrian-made Glock semi-automatic handguns.

Importantly as well, Mentor’s patrol officers will now be using handguns chambered for 9mm caliber instead of .45 ACP caliber.

Mentor has subscribed for open bids from qualified and properly licensed firearms dealers only, both for the purchase of the new Glocks as well as the sale of the now-in-use 11-year-old Kimbers.

The city’s extensively detailed bid package is contained within a 21-page document.

Among other contractual stipulations the winning bidder must provide a lifetime warrantee for each weapon sans any abuse, that each handgun be test fired and certified to shoot Winchester-brand Ranger Talon ammunition, and that each weapon come with three magazines.

Asked about the swap-out, Mentor Police Captain Andrew Lehner said the process was extensive with the department believing the Glocks offered both the best value and the best weapon.

"We believe the stopping power is just as good with the Glock's capacity being more," Lehner said.

Lehner said as well the last thing any police department can afford is see its service weapons fail at a critical moment, hence the need to make the switch now before maintaining the invetory of Kimbers becomes too expensive and too time-consuming.

"We cannot afford to wait for the weapons to breakdown," he said.

Likewise the police department is looking for a single bidder to buy 104 so-called “police property guns.” These firearms include handguns, shotguns, and rifles and represent guns that were turned over to the police by people who no longer wanted them or felt comfortable owning them as well as weapons forfeited to the police by the courts.

The property firearms represent the entire class of firearms from well-respected and high-dollar guns to those often derided by firearms experts and enthusiasts as “junk.”

Examples of the former include a Ruger Mini-14 in .223 caliber and a new-in-the-box Springfield model XD-9 pistol, as well as an Israeli-made 9mm Uzi.

At the other end of the firearms’ spectrum are such less-desirable species as several Hi-Point pistols, a Jimenez 9mm pistol, and a J.C. Higgins .22-caliber rifle.

As for the Kimber-to-Glock move the Mentor Police Department is looking to obtain 78 Glock Model 17s with night sights installed, 24 Glock Model 19s with night sights installed, and five Glock Model 26s with night sights installed. All are to be chambered for the 9mm caliber round.

Appropriate “leather” (holsters) also are part of the required inventory the FFL-licensed-only dealers are to include with their sealed bids.

The three Austrian-built Glock pistol models have real-world/individual piece selling prices of around $550 each.

However, each of the so-called Generation 4 Glock pistol models are coveted by law enforcement and civilian shooters  for their reliability, ease of handling, and performance.

To be sold off are 63 Kimber Stainless Steel Model II duty pistols, 13 Kimber Pro Carry HD II pistols, four Kimber Ultra CDP II pistols, and 20 Kimber Custom TLE pistols.

All of the Kimbers are based on the 103-year-old Model 1911 pistol design and are chambered for the more powerful .45 ACP round.

Kimber pistols are often cited as being among the elite of production-built handguns with real-world/individual selling prices of $700 to more than $1,000 each.

The bids are to be received by the city no later than June 18, after which all such packages are to be immediately opened.

Asked how much the swap-out might cost the city, Lehner said he could not say, at least not until the bids are open on Wednesday.

For a comprehensive look at the bid requirements and other related details, visit Mentor’s web site at www.cityofmentor.com/category/rfp.

- Jeffrey L. Frischkorn
JFrischk@Ameritech.net


Jeff Frischkorn is the retired News-Herald reporter who covered the earth sciences, the area's three county park systems and the outdoors for the newspaper.
During his 30 years with The News-Herald Jeff was the recipient of more than 100 state, regional and national journalism awards.
He also is a columnist and features writer for the Ohio Outdoor News, which is published every other week and details the outdoors happenings in the state.

Thursday, June 12, 2014

UPDATED: Supressor use for hunting in Ohio not getting silent treatment



Ohio’s deer hunters may soon have the opportunity to learn for themselves whether silence truly is golden.

The state is inching toward accepting the use of silencers – a term that is the technical equal to the term suppressors, says the National Rifle Association’s “Firearms Fact Book” – for hunting. Under consideration is a proposal to allow the use of these devices.

Leading the high-decibel exchange in favor of silencer allowance is the Buckeye Firearms Association which has been giving the state legislature an earful on the subject.

While Ohio does allow firearms owners to possess silencers it is one of 10 such states to also prohibit them for use while hunting. Currently 39 states permit silencer ownership and use in one form or another.

Thus the Buckeye Firearms Association’s on-going efforts is designed to see that House Bill 234 makes it through both legislative chambers and signed into law by Gov. John Kasich.

Yet as it now stands The Ohio Department of Natural Resources’ Division of Wildlife is neutral on the subject.

However, the federal government is not so disposed. In fact, the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives is legislatively mandated to regulate silencers in virtually the same way as it does fully automatic firearms.

Which legally implies that a person desiring to own a silencer must seek out a person possessing what’s called a Class III firearms license, buy the device from that individual, undergo a thorough federal background check, clear a prospective purchase with one’s local police chief or similar law enforcement authority, wait up to six months for approval, pay a $200 federal tax as well as a likely transfer fee from the Class III license holder.

Based on the latest ATF statistics (2012) there were 360,534 licensed silencers in the U.S., including 10,407 in Ohio. The state with the highest number of registered silencers was Texas with 47,712 and the least was Rhode Island with 27.

Then there is the silencer itself; a device that can – and does - cost anywhere from a bare-bones model for $300 on up to $2,500 and even more.

Owners have to understand too that silencers are worse than new-born babies, requiring constant maintenance and attention.

They also can uglify some firearms, critics say, the devices being likened to hunks of cast-iron sewer pipe at the end of a gloriously refined rifle barrel.

Still, anyone thinking of making their own silencer should note that the federal government frowns on that sort of project even more so than it does distilling hooch in the woods.

At least from a wildlife management standpoint, silencers would neither add to nor detract from the ability of Ohio to keep in check the state’s deer herd.

“If it’s an issue at all it would be with law enforcement,” said Mike Tonkovich, the Wildlife Division’s deer management administrator.

Tonkovich said that over decades of observing deer and listening to hunters gripe, praise and question deer behavior, the net belief is that white-tails react in as many different ways to firearms noise  as there are individual deer.

“I really don’t think it’s going to make much of a difference one way or the other,” Tonkovich says of the possibility of allowing silencers for deer hunting. “Maybe it’s just a novelty.”

A possible benefit to silencers, says Tonkovich, is whether the lack of loud gunfire might make firearms usage more palatable in semi-rural/semi-urban areas.

“All safety concerns aside,” Tonkovich also says, “perhaps that will help us better manage urban deer.”

Silencers are not a cure-all nor are they perfect for every hunting situation even some experts and silencer manufacturers note.

Important to consider is the cost over and above the required federal stamp and any dealer transfer fee.

As a for instance, West Valley City, Utah-based SilencerCo. has a model (the Harvester 30) set aside for .30-caliber rifles with a suggested retail price of $750. And the company’s Harvester Big Bore 338 has a retail price of $1,600.

Even the firm’s Warlock 22 for .22-caliber firearms has a suggested retail price that is only one dollar shy of $300.

And while silencers have provided commendable duty in such Scandinavian countries as Finland where the devices are sometimes required on rifles, even one of that nation’s leading manufacturers says placing one on a shotgun poses technical challenges.

Finland’s Reflex Suppressors Company’s web site says this on the adaptation of silencers to shotguns:

“The limitations with suppressing shotguns are: 1 – With standard supersonic ammo the flight noise of shot is so high, that the suppressed noise is only 5-6 dB lower than as (one) unsuppressed.

“If one gets or can load subsonic ammo, the noise reduction is quite enough for hearing protection. 2 - Only single-barrel shotguns can be suppressed with a reasonable amount of work. 3- (A) suppressor affects balance and sight line of the shotgun.”

And the web sites of several other silencer manufacturers as well as those of firearms experts note that properly mounting a device on the end of a rifle barrel is critical for optimum accuracy and effectiveness.

Don’t bother going there with the idea of employing a silencer on a muzzle-loading rifle, experts say.

That is because in all probability a silencer would have to be removed before a round is stuffed down a muzzle-loader’s tube while the matter of black-powder smoke coughing out the end  is something that a silencer cannot cure.

Then too silencers can and do collect moisture as bullets pass through the devices; enough so that if a silencer-equipped rifle is allowed to stand barrel up in a gun vault the water will work its way down into the rifle’s action, some firearms experts have opined.

Silencers further have this dirty habit of attracting the grit and grime from powder residue as the bullet-propelling gases pour out the silencer’s business end.

Undeterred by any negatives-  be they the hoops necessary to legally acquire a silencer, their cost and maintenance, even their bulbous looks - the Buckeye Firearms Association is pressing on and is making legislative headway.

Partly because the volunteer group has demonstrated to legislators that a non-silenced rifle has a decibel level of 160 to 170 dBs while a similar rifle outfitted with a device experiences a noise reduction to around 120 dB.

While 120 decibels is less than the pain threshold (130 decibels) it is still more than for either the noise erupting from a rock concert (110 decibels) or what roars from a motorcycle engine (100 decibels).

Just as importantly, says the Firearms Association, there is no case history recorded by the Wildlife Division of a poacher employing a silencer, either.

Other benefits cited by the pro-firearms group includes oft-times increased rifle accuracy and reduced muzzle blast.

Besides, making choices is what being an American firearms owner is all about, says Larry Moore.

“Exactly” says Moore . “We should have the freedom to make our own decisions.”

Moore is an official with the Firearms Association and is an expert on the topic who has offered testimony before the state legislature.

Besides, says Moore, if silencers are legal now than they also should be legally allowed for hunting, particularly with the so-called modern sporting rifles which increasingly are becoming popular with varmint hunters.

“It’s an option we should be allowed to have, no question,” Moore says. “There simply is no reason to deny us from being allowed to use suppressors for hunting, especially when there is no Ohio law preventing us from owning them.”

- Jeffrey L. Frischkorn
JFrischk@Ameriteh.net

Jeff is the retired News-Herald reporter who  covered the earth sciences, the area's three county park systems and the outdoors for the newspaper. During his 30 years with The News-Herald Jeff was the recipient of more than 100 state, regional and national journalism awards. He also is a columnist and features writer for the Ohio Outdoor News, which is published every other week and details the outdoors happenings in the state.

Tuesday, June 10, 2014

For 12th straight year no Chronic Wasting Disease found in Ohio's deer herd



For now Ohio’s deer herd appears clean of any chronic wasting disease.

Again, for now at least, Ohio officials are saying.

In an annual cooperative venture between the Ohio departments of Agriculture and Natural Resources, officials with both agencies are saying that routine testing of largely – though not exclusively - road-kill white-tail deer has failed to indicate the presence of Chronic Wasting Disease, or CWD, in Ohio.

CWD is a degenerative disease of the brain caused by malfunctioning proteins, called prions. The disease is always fatal and this particular form of a tongue-twisting so-named Transmissible Spongiform Encephalopathy (TSEs) ailment strikes white-tail and mule deer along with elk.

Other variations impact other mammal species, including humans. However, no evidence exists that CWD can be transferred to humans even by eating an infected animal.

A November 2004 scientific report compiled by officials with the Centers for Disease Control on the subject drew the following conclusion:

“The lack of evidence of a link between CWD transmission and unusual cases of CJD, despite several epidemiologic investigations, and the absence of an increase in CJD incidence in Colorado and Wyoming suggest that the risk, if any, of transmission of CWD to humans is low

“Although the in vitro studies indicating inefficient conversion of human prion protein by CWD-associated prions raise the possibility of low-level transmission of CWD to humans, no human cases of prion disease with strong evidence of a link with CWD have been identified.

“However, the transmission of (CWD) indicate that, provided sufficient exposure, the species barrier may not completely protect humans from animal prion diseases.”

Consequently, the potential health concerns remain along with worries as to whether CWD might pose a serious threat to the stability of Ohio’s deer herd.

Not lost either is potential risk that the mere reporting of CWD-infected animals might have on local hunting-based tourism. In some states, hunters have stopped chasing deer due to fears of CWD being found in a particular state’s deer herd.

Both federal and state wildlife and agricultural officials with both state and federal various agencies went to work from September of last year to April collecting road-kill deer. Samples from 753 animals were assembled.

Also, another 88 hunter-harvested bucks and an additional nine deer collected elsewhere were sampled. These deer displayed symptoms similar to those symptoms addressed by CWD infection, the ODNR and ODA both say.

Yet all of the samples taken were demonstrated as being CWD free. Thus such intensive sampling over 12 consecutive years has shown Ohio deer as being free of the CWD disease.

Even so, the absence of CWD in the tested samples is not proof positive that somewhere in Ohio there is lurking an infected deer or even a small group of infected deer.

Still, the ODNR’s Division of Wildlife says Ohio is so densely populated that someone somewhere would take note of a CWD-sick deer.

Presently 22 states and two Canadian provinces have recorded CWD infection. Among them include a number of Ohio neighboring states including West Virginia, Pennsylvania, and Michigan along with such nearby states as New York, Illinois, and Virginia.

In the end, health and wildlife officials all agree that hunters are on the front line on both detection and personal protection.

To this end deer hunters are urged to take proper and appropriate action to prevent contamination, regardless of how insignificant such a risk exists.

These precautions include wearing synthetic gloves while field-dressing and butchering a deer, avoid eating meat from a sickly looking deer or elk minimize handing or touching brain and related nervous system parts, bone out the meat, along with eating deer and elk tissues known to harbor the CWD agent (e.g., brain, spinal cord, eyes, spleen, tonsils, lymph nodes) from areas where CWD has been identified.

For further information, visit the Agriculture Department’s web site at www.ohioagriculture.gov , the ODNR’s web site at www.wildohio.gov, or the Chronic Wasting Disease Alliance at cwd-info.org.

- Jeffrey L. Frischkorn
JFrischk@Ameritech.net

Jeff Frischkorn is a retired News-Herald's reporter who covered the earth sciences, the area's three county park districts, as well as the outdoors for nearly 30 years. He continues covering the latter through this blog. Jeff also writes a column and feature stories for the Ohio Outdoor News, which is published every other week and concerns itself with matters associated with Ohio's varied outdoors scene.