In a
juxtaposition of genuine concern, bubbling anger and a heartfelt belief that
Ohio’s deer management program is off-kilter, some 90 sportsmen and landowners
listened intently January 23 in Akron while the state’s wildlife officials
presented their side of the multi-headed topic.
That
90-person figure represented just the number of people who assembled at the
Ohio Division of Wildlife’s District Three (Northeast Ohio) office in Akron.
Other – albeit,
smaller – crowds were concurrently gathered in each of the agency’s other four
wildlife districts, all of the congregations going through the same established
protocols that explored three different and pre-determined components:
An update on
chronic wasting disease in Ohio, the deer herd condition trends in the state,
and a look at the anticipated transition to greatly refined deer management
units, likely to transpire beginning with the commencement of the various 2016-2017
deer-hunting sessions.
The five-district
concurrent program also represented an expanded offshoot from the state’s
first-ever Ohio Deer Summit, held at just one location last year. This year’s
program at five venues allowed for easier access and participation by
interested stakeholders, Wildlife Division officials said.
And though
Akron’s first presentation by District Three wildlife biologist Scott Peters
was carefully observed by summit attendees, it was the second address by the
Wildlife Division’s deer management administrator Mike Tonkovich that fell
totally on wide-awake ears.
No wonder
since Tonkovich is the lead agent on how the Wildlife Division looks at such
thorny and tough-nut-to-crack issues on the order of bag limits, numbers of deer-hunting
seasons and their lengths, fawn recruitment, coyote depredation on deer, deer
herd health, composition and population size/density, along with a plethora of
other associated satellite topics.
Given the
balancing act of juggling what this or that hunter wants with the interests of landowners
even Tonkovich wryly noted the challenges he and his agency associates face.
“I know I am
doing my job if I am hated equally by everybody,” Tonkovich said.
Yes,
Tonkovich said, the Wildlife Division is well aware that the state’s deer herd
is smaller, even much smaller than what it, landowners, sportsmen and other
stakeholders saw a decade or two ago.
Yet the
reduction was necessary, Tonkovich said, noting that with a herd that swelled to
unprecedented high numbers was not in its best interest.
If anything,
just the opposite, Tonkovich said, pointing out that when the state’s deer herd
blossomed to mind-boggling numbers its health suffered.
“There is
other evidence that supports the decline in the overall health of Ohio’s deer
herd, too,” Tonkovich says. “We have much older bucks running out but with smaller
antlers.”
Such comes
with a biological understanding that too much competition for a hard-hit
natural food source was resulting in an ever-so-slow decline in the production
of trophy bucks.
To
illustrate, Tonkovich notes that submissions of qualifying entries into the
popular Ohio Big Bucks Club have not kept pace with the annual, overall
antlered deer kill.
Indeed, Tonkovich
continued, the odds of a buck being eligible for inclusion in the Ohio Big
Bucks Club is today one-half of what it was in 1990.
Along with an
almost imperceptible drop in the number of trophy bucks came reduced poor fawn
recruitment with females exhibiting the natural phenomenon of lowered pregnancy
rates during times of distressed habitat.
“The roller
coaster is now on its way down,” Tonkovich said.
Perhaps but
more than a few attendees believe that ride is headed south too fast and has
already plummeted too far.
When given
the opportunity to express themselves several attendees would recite the same
mantra, that being, “I hunted the gun season/the early doe-only muzzle-loading
season/the statewide muzzle-loading season/the archery deer-hunting season and
I never saw an animal.”
Other participants
groused how the Wildlife Division should never have allowed – and must end –
allowing hunters to legally kill “four, five and six deer.”
“That’s too
many; you can’t use that many,” complained one of the summit’s attendees.
Meanwhile, taxidermist
Fritz Brekhimer of Trumbull County’s Cortland provided an anecdotal glimpse of
the Ohio’s deer herd decline by saying this season he’s received only about 100
deer heads for mounting purposes.
“I usually see
150,” Brekhimer said.
And no one
argued with Joel Reynolds of Delaware County who chimed in that the Wildlife
Division must come up with a resolution to the state’s ever-expanding coyote
population, an almost certain major factor in an ever-shrinking deer herd.
“I’d prefer
to kill them all,” Reynolds said of the coyotes, not the deer.
Reynolds
said too that a solution must be found before his nine-year-old son Caleb loses
interest in deer hunting before he even graduates from apprentice hunter status
to a legally licensed junior hunter, complete with having passing a hunter
education course.
And thus the
onus of what will percolate to the top when the Wildlife Division’s work-still-in-progress
refined deer management unit strategy goes from concept stage to show-room
model rests squarely with the agency; the bulk of the summit’s attendees
appeared to share.
“(With) all
of the issues we’ve talked about, we are here to remind the Ohio Division of
Wildlife that you work for us,” said Dennis Malloy, an official with Whitetails
Unlimited and himself a former agency wildlife officer.
- Jeffrey L. FrischkornJFrischk@Ameritech.net
Jeff is the retired News-Herald reporter who covered the earth sciences, the area's three county park systems and the outdoors for the newspaper. During his 30 years with The News-Herald Jeff was the recipient of more than 100 state, regional and national journalism awards. He also is a columnist and features writer for the Ohio Outdoor News, which is published every other week and details the outdoors happenings in the state.
No comments:
Post a Comment