The
poorly vetted proposal to require coyote hunters to buy a trapping
tag first certainly shows how out of step are the Ohio Division of
Wildlife and the Ohio State Trappers Association.
Just
as the two tried to do in 2018 with a went-down-in-flames attempt to
create a season on the taking of bobcats.
You
might hear all kinds of stories how wiser state natural resources
heads prevailed, with the matter eventually scuttled by the
eight-member Ohio Wildlife Council.
Yet
the fact is the agency – with blessing of trappers - put the idea
on the market and attempted to sell the lemon. Thus the Wildlife
Division owns it in larger measure.
So
you’d think the couple would have learned from their epic 2018
bobcat blunder. They haven’t, and are now engaged in an idea of
equal harebrained gobbledygook. This is a coyote clinker of an idea.
What
the Wildlife Division is floating is the leaded balloon concept that
hunters – not just trappers – be required to buy a trapping
license before being allowed to shoot/kill/take a coyote.
That
requirement would lasso not just a determined fur hunter who intends
to gut, skin and sell the hide of a coyote but also the casual
archery or gun hunter who takes aim at a coyote running underneath
his or her deer stand.
Compounding
things is the idea of an actual season on coyotes, complete with a
closure.
A
reason for the season being bandied about is that most of Ohio’s
neighbors have coyote seasons. However, that “But, Dad, EVERYONE is
doing it” excuse is correctly rejected by any responsible adult.
But “responsible” is not always visible in the Wildlife
Division’s windshield.
Alas,
these two-pea-in-a-misinformed pod just cannot grasp that coyotes are
invasive. They are dangerous. They are pests. They are not like other
furbearers.
You
don’t see possums sneaking into suburban backyards and pilfering
puppies let out to do their business. Skunks do not attack Columbus
police officers. Fathers in New Hampshire do not have to strangle
raccoons that attack their children; like one “Live Free Or Die”
Granite State dad did to a coyote on January 20th.
Nor
have any trail camera photos appeared on Facebook of a weasel making
off with a fawn deer clutched in its jaws.
That
is because coyotes are different; a difference the Wildlife Division
and the state trappers group stubbornly refuse to acknowledge.
Just
as sadly the Wildlife Division never seems to stop putting its
fingers into the back pockets of sportsmen, either. Even the $72.6
million the agency collected in Fiscal 2019 doesn’t seem to satisfy
Wildlife Division officials.
Instead,
these officials are all in for trying to reverse the decline in the
number of trapping licenses issued - and the monies derived from them
- by exploiting the wallets of hunters who might take pot shots at
passing coyotes.
The
push to establish a bobcat season was nonsense. And the shove to
demand that hunters first take a trapping course and then buy a
trapping tag just in order to take a poke at a coyote is a trumpery
even more bizarre and outlandish.
- Jeffrey L. Frischkorn
JFrischk@Ameritech.net
JFrischk4@gmail.com
Great prose with humor too! Coyote pelt prices could well be/are the driving force for this hair brained idea by a dwindling lot of half baked fur trappers. The hide has turned on expensive fur collared jackets and the ODNR is getting played for their naivete. Hunters will still shoot them and then let them rot in the woods without getting paid. Classic government overreach. link to fur prices article https://www.marketplace.org/2019/03/18/why-coyote-pelts-are-huge-demand/
ReplyDeleteIts a Fur Harvesters Permit , not a Trappers Permit . Anyone hunting or trapping a furbearer is required to have it . Coon hunters,fox hunters, have had to buy one all along.Coyotes have been listed as a furbearer for a long time under 1 code & not under another code.The code thats the letter of law says there a furbearer. Trappers in order to obtain a fur harvestors permit must complete a Trappers Training Course . Thats been in effect since 1979. None of this is new , accept coyotes being Offically named as a furbearer and a season put on them like all other Furbearers that can be trapped or hunted.
ReplyDeleteThe Ohio State Trappers Association did not bring this proposal about, & were as shocked as anyone else when the bomb was dropped in there lap.
Further , They (OSTA ) did not bring about the bobcat proposal , shocked same as above as the last they knew it would be 5-6 more years atleast of research before it would be even considered .
Get the facts first Frischkorn , before you run your mouth .