Tuesday, February 4, 2020

Ohio's deer hunters kill 7 percent more deer, but buy 8 percent fewer deer tags

Deer hunters in Ohio scored a respectable seven percent increase in the number of animals they killed during the just-completed 2019-2020 season when stacked up against the respective 2018-2019 season.
In all, a preliminary 184,465 deer were taken. This compares to the 172,670 deer killed during the previous season.
For further comparison, during the combined 2017-2018 deer hunting year, hunters shot 186,247 animals. Meanwhile, the 2016-2017 combined tally was 182,169 deer, and the 2015-2016 season produced a deer kill of 188,335 animals.
Still, the 2019-2020 combined count is being heralded as a success by Ohio Division of Wildlife officials. Especially since only 11 of Ohio’s 88 counties encountered declines in the number of deer killed in each of them.
Also, for the fifth or sixth conservative year, more deer total were shot by hunters using archery tackle than by firearms hunters during the combined seven-day general firearms season and the two-day, so-called, bonus season: 88,860 animals for the former and 77,187 deer for the latter.
However, adding the results of the youth-only firearms season and the muzzle-loading season and all firearms still beat all archery tackle in total number of deer killed.
Like I said at the beginning of the season, you’d have to work NOT to shoot a year this year,” said Mike Tonkovich, the Wildlife Division Division’s deer management administrator.
And I think contributing to it was some of the best deer-hunting weather the state has seen in at least a decade,” Tonkovich said, continuing.
As a result, Tonkovich says also, he anticipates “an uptick” in reported deer hunter satisfaction in various participant surveys; some of which are still on-going.
These surveys include one offered to volunteer archery hunters, one that randomly sought out deer hunters, an on-line “open” survey available to anyone, and an intensive survey conducted by The Ohio State University.
These surveys are of great importance in helping us set deer-hunting regulations,” Tonkovich said also.
Even so, wrinkles in the whole fabric of the state’s deer hunting landscape do appear. And these folds may show themselves once the agency stitches together its 2020-2021 deer-hunting season proposals. Such proposals are slated for presentation to the eight-member Ohio Wildlife Council on February 19th, Tonkovich says.
Among the creases is that while hunter success rose this past year a decline of roughly eight percent was encountered in the number of deer licenses sold. Such drops translates into fewer dollars for the agency.
But I am still expecting an increase in hunter satisfaction for the forth year in a row,” Tonkovich said, countering the negatives demonstrated by a decline in deer tag sales.
Other trouble spots are there for the looking, Tonkovich willing admits: places where the deer herd simply has not sustained itself or is on a decline for whatever reason.
Which is why the agency’s staff of biologists and law enforcement personnel will go over the deer kill results carefully, looking for those threads that may continue to unravel, Tonkovich said.
In such incidents “it may time to make a few adjustments” to deer-hunting regulations, particularly in regards to bag limits, Tonkovich says.
It would be done selectively, not wholesale, with perhaps some adjustments in some counties to address the deer populations in them,” Tonkovich said.
Compounding matters is that the agency does not have a county-by-county way of determining hunter satisfaction in each of those political subdivisions, though the various surveys will help provide some clues, Tonkovich says.
Regarding a potential switch from the present county-oriented deer management approach to adopting a deer zone management approach, Tonkovich declined to comment on any plans nor speculation.
Here is the preliminary 2019-2020 county-by-county Ohio deer hunting kill total with their respective 2018-2019 figures in parentheses:
Adams: 2,793 (2,965); Allen: 1,118 (878); Ashland: 3,378 (2,962); Ashtabula: 4,949 (4,895); Athens: 3,360 (3,455); Auglaize: 960 (826); Belmont: 2,936 (2,629); Brown: 2,315 (2,278); Butler: 1,454 (1,273); Carroll: 3,843 (3,476); Champaign: 1,266 (1,115); Clark: 761 (748); Clermont: 2,412 (2,308); Clinton: 772 (703); Columbiana: 3,180 (2,799); Coshocton: 6,715 (6,063); Crawford: 1,256 (1,123); Cuyahoga: 903 (930); Darke: 809 (687); Defiance: 1,763 (1,588); Delaware: 1,519 (1,408); Erie: 1,058 (1,021); Fairfield: 1,857 (1,799); Fayette: 340 (290); Franklin: 735 (736); Fulton: 795 (707); Gallia: 2,191 (2,499); Geauga: 1,922 (1,858); Greene: 842 (809); Guernsey: 4,524 (4,307); Hamilton: 1,550 (1,549); Hancock: 1,387 (1,145); Hardin: 1,459 (1,163); Harrison: 3,594 (3,214); Henry: 783 (675); Highland: 2,565 (2,283); Hocking: 3,163 (2,803); Holmes: 4,507 (3,934); Huron: 2,291 (2,104); Jackson: 2,821 (2,855); Jefferson: 2,077 (1,684); Knox: 4,746 (4,271); Lake: 849 (799); Lawrence: 1,552 (1,806); Licking: 4,878 (4,587); Logan: 2,163 (1,949); Lorain: 2,134 (2,080); Lucas: 778 (721); Madison: 555 (484); Mahoning: 1,884 (1,908); Marion: 926 (788); Medina: 2,141 (2,084); Meigs: 2,910 (3,083); Mercer: 814 (674); Miami: 879 (735); Monroe: 2,472 (2,282); Montgomery: 770 (701); Morgan: 2,920 (2,940); Morrow: 1,596 (1,487); Muskingum: 4,929 (4,663); Noble: 2,914 (2,909); Ottawa: 517 (476); Paulding: 1,114 (969); Perry: 2,570 (2,447); Pickaway: 800 (727); Pike: 1,901 (1,877); Portage: 2,503 (2,295); Preble: 1,036 (979); Putnam: 849 (699); Richland: 3,469 (3,263); Ross: 2,974 (2,758); Sandusky: 880 (832); Scioto: 2,030 (2,162); Seneca: 2,054 (1,776); Shelby: 1,100 (901); Stark: 2,848 (2,788); Summit: 1,498 (1,469); Trumbull: 3,668 (3,462); Tuscarawas: 5,781 (5,245); Union: 960 (923); Van Wert: 553 (495); Vinton: 2,439 (2,392); Warren: 1,213 (1,130); Washington: 3,292 (3,110); Wayne: 2,411 (2,082); Williams: 1,660 (1,558); Wood: 1,050 (909); Wyandot: 1,562 (1,451). 2020 total: 184,465. 2019 total: (172,670)

- By Jeffrey L. Frischkorn
JFrischk@Ameritech.net
JFrischk4@gmail.com

No comments:

Post a Comment